2 ms·
It’s not really a loophole. It has been affirmed and reaffirmed and reaffirmed again. Nothing “sneaky” about it, just the case law hasn’t caught up to the amoun
by ethanbond 3y ago
It’s not really a loophole. It has been affirmed and reaffirmed and reaffirmed again. Nothing “sneaky” about it, just the case law hasn’t caught up to the amount and quality of privately-held data.
More entities should be subject to the telco exception to 3rd Party Doctrine.
- JohnFen 3y ago> It has been affirmed and reaffirmed and reaffirmed again. Doesn't mean it's not a loophole. The law is filled with loopholes that aren't sneaky at all. This is a loophole around the fourth amendment, and it allows law enforcement to violate people's constitutional rights without consequence.