4 ms·
Sure, but for many langs hermetic config is an issue, you want to be relatively sure what your devs are building against is what gets deployed.
by throwawaymaths 3y ago
Sure, but for many langs hermetic config is an issue, you want to be relatively sure what your devs are building against is what gets deployed.
- moonchrome 3y agoSo you'll develop directly on the wasm runtime locally which should be a platform abstraction ? The way I see it VM -> Containers -> WASM is a logical progression in the same direction from the perspective of deploying applications.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- throwawaymaths 3y agoI mean i don't think you get it. Wasm doesn't ship with a filesystem, POSIX support tools, etc. You only get your language runtime, so they're not comparable. Bare metal, VM, and containers all "look the same", like from a UX perspective. Wasm does not.
- moonchrome 3y agoThat's solved by WASI which is like POSIX of WASM. Nobody is arguing that WASM today will replace containers - 2030 is a long time away in tech.
- throwawaymaths 3y agoWasi is POSIX but not like filesystem, ls, cat, etc.
- syrusakbary 3y agoWASI is not POSIX. WASIX is POSIX :) https://wasix.org https://wasix.org
- throwawaymaths 3y agoI though wasi recently voted to add POSIX in officially