> Just nitpicking but is size of the fee ($250k) really relevant? Yes - because, in general, large rewards can disproportionately skew a decision maker's risk

> Just nitpicking but is size of the fee ($250k) really relevant? Yes - because, in general, large rewards can disproportionately skew a decision maker's risk evaluation. Especially in a situation where there may be only verly limited opportunities to get paid. For an example see the 1986 K2 disaster [1]. I'm not saying this did or didn't happen in the present tragic situation. But its a risk. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_K2_disaster https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_K2_disaster