Im not sure I buy the benefits of your scenario. Abrasive behavior has side effects, so it excludes both good contributors and abusives like your definition.

Im not sure I buy the benefits of your scenario. Abrasive behavior has side effects, so it excludes both good contributors and abusives like your definition. The alternative is more or less silent treatment, abusives dont get engagement with their “contribution” because no one has time to waste on it. This also discourages them, and it doesnt scare off helpful but emotionally sensitive contributors. This isnt to say you dont prefer the abrasive community! I just doubt the efficacy of that approach to getting shit done.