3 ms·

Curious to know how this compares to mid journey v5

• vitorgrs 3y ago
  Midjourney IMO still better (especially because it can do hands), but this actually come pretty close. I created some amazing pictures with it already!
• nickthegreek 3y ago
  Until it gets a control net release, MJ will be better.
• orbital-decay 3y ago
  It's not better out of the box for text to image, this was known for quite some time. However, as soon as they release the weights (in a month as they promise), it will benefit from the tooling available for SD, without being limited to text to image. It's also a foundational model, not a finished product, and MJ will possibly use it, like they did in v4 with SD 1.5.
  • Klaus4 3y ago
    MJv4 is not related to SD at all
    • andybak 3y ago
      Got a link for that? I'm genuinely asking as I didn't know this.
    • orbital-decay 3y ago
      I might be misremembering, but didn't they announce in their twitter that they were using SD somehow for MJ v4? Later deleting this with a bunch of other tweets.
      • Klaus4 3y ago
        There were test/testp models that were based on SD, but v4 and v5 are created from scratch.
        • emikulic 3y ago
          Emad said SD cost $600,000 to train. I wonder if Midjourney also had to pay that to train from scratch.
  • starshadowx2 3y ago
    Midjourney only used a combination of SD and their own stuff with the --beta and --test/testp model which came between V3 and V4, other versions have no connection to SD.