3 ms·
yes. Sometimes that can be OK, if the cyclic fatigue was from high levels of testing. If on the other hand it happens quickly and you haven't even tested it a
by ender341341 3y ago
yes.
Sometimes that can be OK, if the cyclic fatigue was from high levels of testing.
If on the other hand it happens quickly and you haven't even tested it at anywhere near the depth you expect to take it and don't have tons of testing yeah, it's really bad idea. (which seems to be the case here)
- tappaseater 3y agoIt reminds of the story of the de Havilland Comet, which had a bad habit of breaking up in mid-air. Engineers submerged the fuselage of the plane in and out of deep water to simulate pressure changes and it finally failed. leading to the diagnosis of metal fatigue. I mean that was 70 years ago. You'd think it might have crossed his mind.
- pengaru 3y agoI think aluminum is much better understood as having effectively no endurance fatigue limit [0] in that its threshold keeps dropping as the cycles progress. It's expected for cracks to form in aluminum parts of such planes, IIRC they're X-Ray'd on a schedule to discover cracks and replace the relevant parts. I don't know if CF is expected to behave similarly. You certainly don't see it as an obvious quality of CF bicycle frames, as is visible with aluminum frames. The aluminum bikes have such thick beefy tubes and harsh/rigid ride quality to eliminate crack-forming cyclic stresses. CF bikes are considered more comfortable since they don't have to prevent all the flex, as well as being lighter. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:S-N_curves.PNG https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:S-N_curves.PNG