>I argue the only valid statistic is x% remain non-smokers at y years, something comparable to other methods. Absolutely agree, but our problem is time, we did

>I argue the only valid statistic is x% remain non-smokers at y years, something comparable to other methods. Absolutely agree, but our problem is time, we did our first patient around 8 months ago, so we're just limited by that timeline. So far so good though, followup shows classic Aversion reactions, the people that were affected still have a very strong reaction to the taste and smell.