3 ms·
You can find danger in anything, eventually you grow up and learn it's necessary to balance risk vs reward. Let's ban cars outright, I have factual proof someo
by pupppet 3y ago
You can find danger in anything, eventually you grow up and learn it's necessary to balance risk vs reward. Let's ban cars outright, I have factual proof someone died in a car accident today!
- Solvency 3y agoWho said to ban cars or vaccines? I said this topic can and should be discussible without devolving into hysterics and weird conclusions like yours, and the corporate impunity of pharmaceutical agencies is worth examining.
- pupppet 3y agoYep because Rogan and RFK, a meeting of scientific minds just want a thoughtful discussion on the topic. Their intention is to 100% shit on vaccines and make their audience fearful of them.
- ifyoubuildit 3y agoWhy would they (or anyone for that matter) want that? Are you just imagining them as evil mustache twirling villains?
- pupppet 3y agoI wouldn't give them enough credit to be twirling mustache villains, they're just ignorant.
- revelio 3y agoIf they're ignorant then Hotez should be able to destroy them on air, with ease, shouldn't he? The actual fear here is not that these guys are ignorant idiots but rather that they will in fact make many correct points that aren't easy to refute at all, and that Hotez - a completely discredited person who has said many untrue things - would end up losing the debate comprehensively. Which is why he has now backpedalled. It should be an easy $100k+ win for a charity of his choice but he can't do it.
- pupppet 3y agoHe doesn't need to debate them any more than we need to debate flat-earthers, it's just giving them the exposure they crave. Also totally normal that politicians and radio personalities want to debate him and not fellow scientists.
- lostlogin 3y agoRogan would say that cars are ok, as long as they are ICE. You can guess his views on EVs.