3 ms·
Ya but even so they could have sent rescue ships there because "we think it could be here" - nothing given up.
by buggythebug 3y ago
Ya but even so they could have sent rescue ships there because "we think it could be here" - nothing given up.
- CoastalCoder 3y agoI could imagine a cost-benefit analysis making sense here. - Pro: increased chance of saving a few people's lives - Con: risk of leaking info about U.S. sonar sensitivity I.e., the decision would depend on the magnitude of the "pro" and "con" probabilities.
- WalterBright 3y agoIf it imploded the chance of survival is zero.
- aflag 3y agoIf they detected an implosion there's no chance of saving anyone's lives. It would increase the chance of maybe finding bodies, though.
- toss1 3y agoAlso - Pro: Excellent realistic training opportunity to maintain and upgrade skills
- bell-cot 3y agoAudible-at-a-distance implosion ==>> Everyone inside is ~liquified The actual Pro would be "minor calibration opportunity for our secret sensor network".
- politician 3y agoIt gives up bounds on how fast we can locate something.
- buggythebug 3y agoor don't announce anything and just find it