3 ms·
TBF it is true. but that doesnt mean that those employees will be fired, hopefully they will be assigned to something less bullshitty. E.g. for people in acade
by seydor 3y ago
TBF it is true. but that doesnt mean that those employees will be fired, hopefully they will be assigned to something less bullshitty.
E.g. for people in academia i am sure it has removed a lot of 'bs job time' already
- nathan_compton 3y agoI'm in academia and the fact is that for anything not well represented in its training data, even GPT4 is next to useless.
- seydor 3y agoit s been great for formatting reports etc. i find it very useful
- nathan_compton 3y agoI've tried using it for correcting drafts but I've caught it not faithfully reproducing text too many times to trust it.
- seydor 3y agocorrecting things is obviously not it strength. but it can easily convert a bullet list to an article
- AlexandrB 3y agoOr maybe they'll be assigned to something even more bullshitty or just more menial.
- yieldcrv 3y ago> TBF it is true. but that doesnt mean that those employees will be fired, hopefully they will be assigned to something less bullshitty. I think that people miss that headcount will just stop increasing first, everyone is looking for mass layoffs and miss that other component. I don't have a problem with that. Just find it interesting that people who would have a problem with it aren't considering it.