4 ms·
> Youtube is generally a better source for recipes I'm also catching myself more often than I want watching some youtube video that essentially delivers a well
by est31 3y ago
> Youtube is generally a better source for recipes
I'm also catching myself more often than I want watching some youtube video that essentially delivers a well researched but not needlessly dumbed down piece on a scientific/educational topic such as city planning, physics, architecture, or history... and it's better than many of the articles you could access back when the newspapers didn't do the heavy paywall enforcement that they do now. Nowadays, newspapers are even less accessible. It's amazing that videos fare better here. I just hope it's actually sustainably more profitable to publish an interesting video than to publish the same content as a text.
- ssnistfajen 3y agoVideo is inherently a more versatile format than text, and Youtube video essays generally have good self control on their own lengths. My favourite channels for these sorts of content generally keep their videos between 10-30mins which are long enough to get me hooked but short enough to avoid losing my attention. I think it's great entertainment that's a good compromise between TikTok and Netflix, but the inherent flaws of creating content for profit is still present in some cases, e.g. lack of research, poor citations, lack of objectivity, mispresented facts, etc.