>so unless the votes were >90% in favor of banning, there's always going to be someone's morals being forced upon others. It seems to be that unless the votes

>so unless the votes were >90% in favor of banning, there's always going to be someone's morals being forced upon others. It seems to be that unless the votes were 100% then there's going to be some moral forcing. Does this mean no laws unless we have complete and total unanimity?