It's also bad for accurate science. Unless you have a team of researchers that can feed 100% accurate data talking points to you in real time, someone is going

It's also bad for accurate science. Unless you have a team of researchers that can feed 100% accurate data talking points to you in real time, someone is going to make a "mistaken" claim at some point that could lead the debate to an entirely inaccurate direction. Improv and theater training would be better than scientific understanding in this arena, so why is one group trying to pretend it isn't?