Rogan seems to actively listen when he has people on. A discussion format is what he would like to do. Nothing seems out of sort for this. He could be comple

Rogan seems to actively listen when he has people on. A discussion format is what he would like to do. Nothing seems out of sort for this. He could be completely wrong on something and invite someone with conflicting views and give them a platform for hours. He doesn't trample all over them in the moment like so many others. I would make the distinction that he is perhaps bad at science, rather than anti-science. He just wants to discuss it, which is the format he prefers to work in. As for a debate not showing the truth, I'll agree. However, I'll also say that there has been a lot of confindence lost in some authority figures who stated things as fact when they should have been using weaker statements like, "we believe" or "we don't know, but do this just in case". Sure, it could be said it was politicians making these statements, but they were buttressed by fame seeking scientists. (on the topic of covid) The government and their scientists never admit they were wrong, everything is always stated as fact. Best example of the this is the food pyramid. They just roll out a new one and pretend the previous one never existed. I don't know where we stand right now with regard to either the food pyramid or covid, except to get the new boosters as they come out on the latter.