Chordal editing isn't as popular as modal editing, but I do like it and think it's something uncommon in other editors, at least to the same extant as emacs. T

Chordal editing isn't as popular as modal editing, but I do like it and think it's something uncommon in other editors, at least to the same extant as emacs. The thing I like about emacs is the integration and consistent experience. I can do everything in emacs (and use exwm as my window manager), so I have the same keybindings for everything. As perhaps an extreme example, imagine having 1. A window manager like i3 2. tmux or screen 3. (n)vim or helix sessions with edited files, possibly inside tmux/screen Each of these need to be configured separately, and each layer needs different keybindings so that uncaught ones can be forwarded from one layer to the next. Each layer is limited to only the subset of things it manages. E.g., i3 can let you switch between firefox and the terminal running tmux, but not the different sessions tmux manages, or views of any of the files in your nvim session. Etc. Or I could just use emacs create tiles I can move between, and each of which that is capable of opening any of my x-windows, terminal sessions, or open files. You can even use the same autocomplete in your shell as when editing files. I don't know of anything that gives the same simple, unified, workflow of EXWM (+ corfu&consult&...). It does have issues and could use a serious modernization -- still single threaded in 2023, with some commands blocking IO??? -- but perhaps it's simply much too ambitious for someone to try and make a competitor. These can have modal editing, tree sitter and lsp integration would be great, etc. The thing I want is the smooth integration of everything I may do on a computer into one interface that emacs, but no other software I'm aware of, offers.