3 ms·
I very much doubt you have all the authors, some components are RH creations, but not all. In any case, a company hiring one or two open source contributors cov
by 6c696e7578 3y ago
I very much doubt you have all the authors, some components are RH creations, but not all. In any case, a company hiring one or two open source contributors covers a lot of gaps as they're the type of people who can do deep investigations. For systemd, for sure, there's inhouse development there.
My gripe about the original thread was bosses interrupting that investigation and telling the onsite staff to open a case elsewhere, IMO, that's disruptive behaviour.
- zzzeek 3y ago> My gripe about the original thread was bosses interrupting that investigation and telling the onsite staff to open a case elsewhere, IMO, that's disruptive behaviour. I dont think this really happens, when we get these customer issues and the people who have tried to fix the problem are on the phone, they are lost / panicked / at a dead end. They are not like, "yeah we think it's ABC but our boss told us to call you". that's not really a thing. if customers can fix the problem, they do. they are not in a hurry to call redhat for things they can do themselves and they're not really supposed to since their support minutes are a finite resource.
- 6c696e7578 3y agoNobody would do that when logging a ticket because it shows internal company disagreement which often doesn't show the company in a great light. Nobody does that. What typically happens in this situation is the chap logging the ticket gets pissed off and says to the boss, "ticket logged it's with $vendor, I guess it doesn't need babysitting so I'm working on other tickets now". The boss in this case is happy as it shows their earlier investment was a fine idea. The employee though is disgruntled as their toys were taken away and things it's not such a fine place to work.