Rooting for Google on this one. MS has nice products but their entire strategy is vendor lock in. For me, from an infosec perspective that means it is much hard

Rooting for Google on this one. MS has nice products but their entire strategy is vendor lock in. For me, from an infosec perspective that means it is much harder to protect inevitable non-ms stuff and it also means I have to spend too much time fighting MS fanboys (and any $product fanboys) telling them going all in on one vendor will have smooth integration and support but the result is always poor quality products and being told by MS what you need and how you should do stuff instead of you, the customer, telling the vendor you pay what you need and have them do it. Google people overengineer everything but MS just loves adding all sorts of layers of abstraction and complexity too. If Google is like Haskell, MS is C++. I hate how if you use O365 you basically have to use Azure.