3 ms·
> No one mentioned "liberalism" Technically correct, but https://dads.cool/about https://dads.cool/about - the page which we are discussing - makes its politi
by tetromino_ 3y ago
> No one mentioned "liberalism"
Technically correct, but https://dads.cool/about https://dads.cool/about - the page which we are discussing - makes its political alignment clear. They feel the need to explicitly state that they will not federate with right-wing lunatics (Gab); but left-wing lunatics and tankies are apparently welcome.
- benglish11 3y agoAlso the admin has eye contact in his profile photo! Shouldn’t that be labeled ec
- Timon3 3y agoThey clearly state: > dads.cool implements the open source "BLOCKchain" to block interactions with instances that might put our community at risk Earlier they describe the kind of community they are: > dads.cool is an instance for dads; if you apply to become a user, it’s expected that you have, had, or are expecting, at least one (human) child—sorry, but pets are not children, no matter how much we love them. Being a father does not mean identifying or being labeled as a man, nor does it mean that you were involved in the conception of the child you take care of. Foster dads, adoptive dads—anyone who cares for a child and identifies as a dad is welcome here. In that spirit, dads.cool welcomes all sexualities, gender identities, races, levels of mobility, and ages. Now, can you honestly say that left-wing lunatics will put their community at a similar risk as right-wing lunatics? One side is clearly and deliberately not accepting of parts of this community.