4 ms·
That's fascinating. I wonder how formalized and widespread this logic is -- did economists tell leadership, or did they just happen to organically hire spitefu
by Jeff_Brown 3y ago
That's fascinating. I wonder how formalized and widespread this logic is -- did economists tell leadership, or did they just happen to organically hire spiteful leaders?
- mensetmanusman 3y agoAnything except tit for tat loses in game theory, so it's just spiteful
- ketzo 3y agoThis is such a weird example because of how not true it is The most classic game theory example ever, the Prisoner's Dilemma, is solved by cooperation when played iteratively instead of one-shot In general, lots of systems can reach an equilibrium of cooperation
- czzr 3y agoThat is tit for tat - cooperate first and then only defect if your opponent defects, otherwise keep cooperating.