From the original Data Colada article (http://datacolada.org/109 http://datacolada.org/109): "We understand that Harvard had access to much more information th

From the original Data Colada article (http://datacolada.org/109 http://datacolada.org/109): "We understand that Harvard had access to much more information than we did, including, where applicable, the original data collected using Qualtrics survey software. If the fraud was carried out by collecting real data on Qualtrics and then altering the downloaded data files, as is likely to be the case for three of these papers, then the original Qualtrics files would provide airtight evidence of fraud. (Conversely, if our concerns were misguided, then those files would provide airtight evidence that they were misguided.)" It does not appear that Harvard found any evidence that they were misguided...