> The second sentence of your link literally says the average income for white people was four times higher than black people. How is that relevant when GP was

> The second sentence of your link literally says the average income for white people was four times higher than black people. How is that relevant when GP was saying that it's wealth that makes the difference, but the stats show equivalent wealth between the two groups we were talking about: Oranians and black South Africans. The point is that by the data, these two groups aren't wealthy, there's nothing to suggest that Oranians have "a lot of money", and thus GP's assertion is incorrect and was just a random claim not backed by the data.