I don't understand the reasoning that some company has better security than another. It's honestly trivial to set up good security. The main problem is incent

I don't understand the reasoning that some company has better security than another. It's honestly trivial to set up good security. The main problem is incentive to go against/ break that security, which will likely grow with company size, or other factors. So it seems completely unreasonable to trust certain companies over others. Perhaps trusting governments, since they have less silly financial reasons to break security is reasonable.