> Is applying a consequence as a result of an action the same as restricting that action? I mean, I don't disagree this needs to be tested in court if it hasn'

> Is applying a consequence as a result of an action the same as restricting that action? I mean, I don't disagree this needs to be tested in court if it hasn't, but what alternative ways of restriction do you think this is referring to? Do you expect it to only apply to the distributor physically restraining the licensee when attempting to redistribute it? Even the examples given in the license such as imposing fees are applying a consequence.