3 ms·
>Using it as a slur, as originally done by Trump, places you into a very specific camp that is certainly nowhere near moderate. It really does not, and you thi
by hax0ron3 3y ago
>Using it as a slur, as originally done by Trump, places you into a very specific camp that is certainly nowhere near moderate.
It really does not, and you thinking that it does is a good example of the kind of dogmatic "if you are not with me you are with the enemy" attitudes that make so many people annoyed with wokism.
There are many political moderates and even some leftists who are annoyed by wokism.
- zamalek 3y agoThere are liberals and moderates who are annoyed by people who are aware of the plight of minorities? That political compass might need adjustment.
- Anon_Forever 3y ago>There are liberals and moderates who are annoyed by people who are aware of the plight of minorities? No, that's a poorly constructed strawman. Even conservatives care about the plight of minorities. There are liberals and moderates who are annoyed by "woke" leftists who believe acronyms are White supremacy [0], men can get pregnant, taking your top off at a White House event is a positive thing, etc. [0] https://abc7news.com/sfusd-renaming-schools-board-meeting-san-francisco-school-sf/10229093/ https://abc7news.com/sfusd-renaming-schools-board-meeting-sa...
- zamalek 3y agoNo, that's a poorly constructed fallacy fallacy. It really isn't a strawman. What did I define "woke" as? And what did the gp comment say about sentiment towards it?