4 ms·
I need to demonstrate that building emotional safety for a team involves unit cohesion? No, I don't. Like I said, if you can't see how those two concepts conn
by Zetice 3y ago
I need to demonstrate that building emotional safety for a team involves unit cohesion?
No, I don't. Like I said, if you can't see how those two concepts connect, there's nothing here to discuss.
Also for anything I wrote to be an ad hominem, I would have needed to call you a name and also claim that, because you are that name, you are therefore wrong. I did neither, so no ad hominem occurred. There is nothing here for you to be sick of.
You can feel vaguely insulted all you want, but that's got nothing to do with what I wrote.
- hopsthedog 3y agoNo, they’re right — literally every one of your arguments and assertions are predicated on fallacies You sound upset that your points aren’t being acknowledged, but you’re not presenting them clearly and you’re incredibly defensive when responding to feedback You can feel vaguely insulted all you want, but that’s got nothing to do with what I wrote
- Zetice 3y agoI'm not upset? Maybe take that rate limit a bit more seriously, consider why it was applied...