2 ms·
On company time/property...why is that wrong? Unions can approach employees anywhere off company property...but the company can only do it while on company pro
by j_walter 3y ago
On company time/property...why is that wrong? Unions can approach employees anywhere off company property...but the company can only do it while on company property. Who has the advantage?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Timon3 3y agoNow you are switching up your argument. Do you now agree that marketing etc. are also an important factor in these kinds of decisions? > On company time/property...why is that wrong? Earlier you said that employees should make these decisions on facts, and facts alone. It's wrong because companies have a lot of power to distort these facts because of company time/property. If you really want employees to make these decisions just on facts, why would it be bad for the company if unions are allowed to market in breakrooms etc.? > Unions can approach employees anywhere off company property...but the company can only do it while on company property. Who has the advantage? Very, very clearly the company. Because the company can also approach employees outside of company property, but the union can't on company property. This means the company has full control over more than half an employees waking hours, whereas unions have control over exactly nothing.