5 ms·
I imagine it's not yet saving-the-world effective yet. The lab environment likely costs more environmentally than a chicken farm would.
by JoeAltmaier 3y ago
I imagine it's not yet saving-the-world effective yet. The lab environment likely costs more environmentally than a chicken farm would.
- urfullofsht 3y ago[dead]
- dimal 3y agoI think there have been studies that show that you’re correct. My question is how much room is there improve that efficiency as production scales and improves. But even now, there’s the benefit of producing less suffering. No need to breed animals that can’t even support their own weight and spend their entire short lives suffering in darkness, crowded in cages with other suffering beings, awaiting death.
- throwaway462910 3y agoCan't resist: there's already no need, even if we want animal products
- xdennis 3y ago> My question is how much room is there improve that efficiency as production scales and improves. I'm no expert on the matter, but it will likely never be competitive with real meat in either taste or price: - You need a lot of expensive equipment and chemicals to grow fake meat. A chicken just needs food and water. - You need extreme cleanliness to grow fake meat or else you're just growing bacteria. Animals have an immune system and can deal with minor threats. - Cells don't exist in a vacuum. You need to deliver nutrients and remove waste. Animals have lungs, blood vessels, kidneys, and all the other organs needed to maintain the entire biological system which has been optimized over millions of years. - Meat isn't just muscle cells, it's a very complicated structure. Growing separate cells and mushing them together will never give you the same taste. The only real equivalent would be if you could grow a chicken without a brain. > No need to breed animals that can’t even support their own weight and spend their entire short lives suffering in darkness, crowded in cages with other suffering beings, awaiting death. If that bothers you, there are always more expensive ways to eat real meat.
- dimal 3y ago> If that bothers you, there are always more expensive ways to eat real meat I’ve been buying free-range chicken and eggs for a while, but recent reports have said that there is basically no actual free-range chicken or eggs on the market. There’s no oversight, so almost everything labeled as free-range isn’t really free-range, so it’s just more expensive, with no benefit.
- EatingWithForks 3y agoI actually doubt this, but you have to be very particular. You can't just go to the grocery store and pick up a free-range label. But e.g. my local farmer's market has a guy who is definitely pasture-raised chickens with the $$$ to match.
- slimsag 3y agoIn north america, what you want to look for is 'Certified Humane'. They actually have inspections of facilities and generally enforce better baseline standards for animals, like minimum spacing. Not perfect, but probably the best you'll get in a grocery store. Everything else is just marketing terms, and effectively unregulated: 'cage free': a bunch of chickens packed into a large room, effectively a cage. Just not individual/tiny cages. 'free range': they have access to an outdoor area in theory, but it might be a tiny cage, no guarantee the chicken was ever able to use it. 'pasture raised': animals generally spend more time outdoors than indoors, but no guarantee.
- jxramos 3y agothat's an interesting detail, vote with your dollars sort of angle. There are more expensive ways to raise poultry available to us.
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 3y ago> If that bothers you, there are always more expensive ways to eat real meat. Or, you know, just stop eating meat.
- JoeAltmaier 3y ago