4 ms·
> But when the plantiff is using circumstantial evidence to deduce what the email must have contained That's not what's happening. It's sealed to the public, n
by flutas 3y ago
> But when the plantiff is using circumstantial evidence to deduce what the email must have contained
That's not what's happening. It's sealed to the public, not the lawyers.
The article even mentions this:
> The passage appears to be from Exhibit K, a sealed document that the gamers’ lawyers and Microsoft’s attorneys have been arguing over.
> In legal documents, Microsoft characterized the email as an “internal exchange” that should remain sealed; a Microsoft rep declined to comment further.
- Natsu 3y agoDoesn't change our perspective, I'll wait and see how this gets ruled on before trying to make up my mind. I can easily believe that Microsoft would do such a thing, I mean it has repeatedly done so, but I don't like taking one party to a lawsuit's word about evidence I cannot see as fact. I'll see what the judge says, or if they decide to unseal this one.