> "everyone does this [and no I cannot provide any comparable examples]." George Soros-funded DAs represent 20% of Americans after $40M was funneled into races

> "everyone does this [and no I cannot provide any comparable examples]." George Soros-funded DAs represent 20% of Americans after $40M was funneled into races - https://www.foxnews.com/media/george-soros-funded-das-represent-20-americans-40m-funneled-races-report-finds https://www.foxnews.com/media/george-soros-funded-das-repres... Related story from a different source: https://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/george-soros-criminal-justice-reform-227519 https://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/george-soros-criminal... Edit: The invitation was for "comparable", not identical, examples. I provided a much larger scale, but comparable, example of undue influence. That they differ in legality is more an indication of the law's shortcomings, than proof that they're not comparable. Focusing on legality to the exclusion of all other considerations is motivated reasoning.