9 ms·
You really can't see the parallel between uttering ill of the elect, and uttering ill of the new elect?
by throwawa14223 3y ago
You really can't see the parallel between uttering ill of the elect, and uttering ill of the new elect?
- lucideer 3y agoI can absolutely see the parallel if you read a headline and have not made any effort to understand the subject matter in any depth, yes.
- karaterobot 3y agoCan you bullet point some of the key differences, for people who want to learn but don't have time to read the entire text of two different bills? It seems like you have done this work already, and it would be a valuable contribution to the discussion.
- lucideer 3y agoI have not "done this work already" (I have read but summarising and bullet pointing is separate work). The tone of your comment seems facetious - you seem to be expecting me to accept the burden of you being informed enough to comment on a topic. If you want to form an opinion on a topic I'd suggest doing the work learning about it. If you're too lazy to, I'd suggest refraining from commenting in ignorance (though I guess I can do nothing to prevent you).
- NoZebra120vClip 3y agoYour tone is quite insulting and condescending. Are you sure that your comments are legal in Ireland?
- karaterobot 3y agoYour original comment made it seem like you had read the bills you were accusing others of not understanding as well as you, so I was giving you an opportunity to lay out some evidence or make an argument.
- lucideer 3y ago> I was giving you an opportunity to lay out some evidence While the is very generous of you, typically I find in these matters it's customary to place the burden of evidence on the person making the initial claim (in this case that being the the bill is a repeat of / resembles Ireland's old blasphemy laws)