There is a big difference between "staying alive against their own will WITHOUT any possibility to improve" and "staying alive against their own will when there

There is a big difference between "staying alive against their own will WITHOUT any possibility to improve" and "staying alive against their own will when there IS a possibility to improve". Promoting suicide in the second case, and wasting money on it instead of actually improving lives of people suffering is, lets say dumb. If a human is suffering so much that he wants to die, he can do it on his own fast and painless, by buying a bottle of nitrogen for a fifty bucks or less. But if he don't know about how to commit suicide someone (meaning government) needs to rent some facilities for a suicide booth, pay salary for the qualified personnel there, go through regular intensive red tape, paperwork and inspections, pay for the meds for the procedure, pay for the advertisements about it (even if they are not exactly like some Coca-Cola ads, but any brochures or signs or printed poster are essentially ads). All those money can be better directed at education and health improvements for those same people. Because their condition IS REVERSIBLE. Killing them is both stupid and immoral.