Ugh, thanks. That shows the absurdity of trademark infringement and confusion if a company deliberately licenses their trademark to an independent company. I'm

Ugh, thanks. That shows the absurdity of trademark infringement and confusion if a company deliberately licenses their trademark to an independent company. I'm surprised they can be said to be using a mark if all they are doing is licensing it to someone else. IMHO it should be used in a court as a self-admission that there are no confusion concerns and it's just legally wrapped asset fuckery.