There's a weird tendency to lump together C and C++ into "C/C++", as though it was the same language. It’s about as weird as writing “HTML/CSS/JS”, or “Java/Ko

There's a weird tendency to lump together C and C++ into "C/C++", as though it was the same language. It’s about as weird as writing “HTML/CSS/JS”, or “Java/Kotlin”. Like it or not people write related languages and technologies that way. Makes about as much sense as Java/Javascript at this point. Do you know what “ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG21/SG22” is? It’s the C and C++ Compatibility Study Group for ISO C++. For instance the only reason C++20 added designated initializers was for improving C compatibility. Stop pretending C and C++ have nothing to do with each other. Using “C/C++” is fine.