3 ms·

> without bite mark Why? Apple isn't going to brand products with that surely? Sounds like there is yet more back story i.e. trademark trolling - Apple only ap

• nostromo 3y ago
  Because they don’t want people to sell laptops and phones with an uneaten apple on them. It’s pretty simple. The article is written to be ragebait, and judging by the comments here, it’s been successful.
  • wkat4242 3y ago
    If that were the case, why do they apply for all categories instead of just electronics?
• fredoralive 3y ago
  It's the logo for Apple Corps, The Beatles' company. The final settlement for the trademark dispute between the two Apples saw Apple Corps's trademarks transferred to Apple [Computer] Inc and licenced back to Apple Corps Ltd. I suspect the agreement between Apple and Apple probably requires Apple Inc to take reasonable steps to protect the ex-Apple Corps trademarks that they now own, such as filing for registration if needed. Then someone not understanding trademark law and that registering a trademark for a Granny Smith apple as a logo for a record label doesn't mean you're trying to claim all apples for every use.
  • atchoo 3y ago
    Ugh, thanks. That shows the absurdity of trademark infringement and confusion if a company deliberately licenses their trademark to an independent company. I'm surprised they can be said to be using a mark if all they are doing is licensing it to someone else. IMHO it should be used in a court as a self-admission that there are no confusion concerns and it's just legally wrapped asset fuckery.
  • aardvarkr 3y ago
    Wow, finally someone with the real story here. Thanks for explaining the connection to Apple Corp