3 ms·
Yup, and if you avoid using any of the new language constructs like objects and whatnot that C++ brings and basically stick to standard C, maybe using just a bi
by dedward 15y ago
Yup, and if you avoid using any of the new language constructs like objects and whatnot that C++ brings and basically stick to standard C, maybe using just a bit of C++ sugar here and htere, true.... but at that point you might as well be using C, and the argument is really moot.
- Game_Ender 15y agoYou are wrong. Those the only two features that incur any performance penalty for just existing, and even then it's implementation dependent and in some cases can be zero (ie. zero cost exceptions). Other things that are possibly slow, like virtual functions, can be avoided in specific cases when needed. This is similar to many how C projects use structures of functions pointers, for abstraction, but not everywhere (including the Linux kernel).
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]