4 ms·
> There’s not enough resources to watch everything that everybody is doing all the time. Have you ever heard of the name "Edward Snowden"? What everybody is d
by bboygravity 3y ago
> There’s not enough resources to watch everything that everybody is doing all the time.
Have you ever heard of the name "Edward Snowden"?
What everybody is doing is already literally being watched all the time and it has been that way or at least decades and has gotten worse with technological evolution.
- vanviegen 3y agoIndexing people's online activity (in order to search for specific kinds of activiy) is a far cry from watching everything everybody is doing, let alone acting on all that information.
- gmerc 3y agoWait until LLMs meet that data
- balder1991 3y agoIt definitely hasn’t worked then. How’s that approach any efficient?
- xpe 3y agoWhen many people make the claim “it hasn’t worked” wrt some intervention they often miss the point: the key question is change relative to the counterfactual; i.e. having done nothing. So, to evaluate action at t=0, we compare some metric at the real t=1 against the counterfactual at t=1. It is logically invalid to evaluate the efficacy of an action by only comparing the metric at t=0 and t=1. That kind of reasoning error is incredibly common.