most police work nowadays is mouse and cat play. I can foresee them still using those devices but just not using them as a proof in court. example. you put gps

most police work nowadays is mouse and cat play. I can foresee them still using those devices but just not using them as a proof in court. example. you put gps and track some narcotics dealer to a place where they exchange the stuff. you caught everyone. you go in front of the judge, he asks you: how did you know where to find them, do you tracked them by gps [just adding here i know this wont play this way], - no, judge, we just had anonymous tip coming through our hot line. make sense?