3 ms·
I'm not a big fan of unions in general (especially with regards to years = seniority in pay & firing), but on ergonomics I'm with them. It doesn't cost much to
by krschultz 15y ago
I'm not a big fan of unions in general (especially with regards to years = seniority in pay & firing), but on ergonomics I'm with them. It doesn't cost much to implement the warehouse in an ergonomic way, but clearly this company and many like it aren't doing that at all. That has a really important effect on the difficulty of the job.
- mgkimsal 15y agowell... it costs them something more than it cost to have it the way it is now, and since they don't have to pay for the effect on the workers working in the non-ergonomic warehouse, what's the point? If they had to pay for the health/welfare of their workers directly, they'd have an incentive to ergonimicize the place.
- yummyfajitas 15y agoIf they had to pay for the health/welfare of their workers directly... You mean if they had to pay some sort of compensation for work related injuries? Too bad only 50 US states have workers comp laws.
- JVirissimo 15y agoEven if there were no workers comp laws, there would still be workers comp. Why? Because employees demand it and will work for a lower nominal wage in order to get it. Even 17th century pirates had workers comp.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]