> A comparable issue: Feynman noticed unlocked safes were vulnerable to get their code stolen. That would imply that the CVE is that the master password can b

> A comparable issue: Feynman noticed unlocked safes were vulnerable to get their code stolen. That would imply that the CVE is that the master password can be gained from an open kdbx, but that hasn't been my understanding, it's just that the contents can be re-saved with a new master password. Which is more of an analogy to the contents of the safe being vulnerable to be stolen if it's left unlocked.