3 ms·
In the US, workman's comp replaces most civil liability claims. In other words, because workman's comp exists, you can't directly sue your employer; it's part o
by Clubber 3y ago
In the US, workman's comp replaces most civil liability claims. In other words, because workman's comp exists, you can't directly sue your employer; it's part of the law.
https://lawkirkpatrick.com/the-difference-between-civil-cases-and-workers-compensation-cases/ https://lawkirkpatrick.com/the-difference-between-civil-case...
A person is not allowed to sue their employer directly in a civil case. Other times we might see cases where there are both the workers compensation case and a civil case at play. This means that somebody was hurt at work but there was also a third party – someone other than the employer that is believed to be responsible for the accident.
Just recently an ironworker came into the office having fallen at work well as it turns out the step that he fell on was negligently or carelessly built by another contractor who was on the same job. This person has a workers compensation case against his employer and will likely file a civil lawsuit against the other contractor who created this danger through their negligence.
- singleshot_ 3y agoThis post starts by saying “most” civil liability claims are impossible where workman’s compensation exists, which is true, but then the rest of the post seems to suggest it’s a hard and fast rule. It is not. If you are injured at work, seek advice from a professional. One exception: willful misconduct.