> The bias is abundant, it's well known this guy hates crypto. Does that make him wrong? Or somehow not a reliable commentator on the thinking at the SEC (whic

> The bias is abundant, it's well known this guy hates crypto. Does that make him wrong? Or somehow not a reliable commentator on the thinking at the SEC (which is what the actual article is about), given his having worked there? Bias could be an issue if he were speaking about crypto per se, but this is about the SEC.