3 ms·
not sure this is a good comparison. midjourney likes much shorter prompts, and honestly they're all absolutely terrible for anything that isn't 'photo' based. E
by snowe2010 3y ago
not sure this is a good comparison. midjourney likes much shorter prompts, and honestly they're all absolutely terrible for anything that isn't 'photo' based. E.g. ask it to generate a word bubble of the most common programming languages and it will fail every time, no matter what you try. I love it for photo stuff, but for photoshop you'd expect it to be able to do other things as well.
- capybara_2020 3y agoCurious, midjourney does great art and cartoon/comic styles too. Not just realistic images. Most image AI tools are terrible with words. I am curious, what images did you try generating with midjourney?
- jw1224 3y agoThat’s not a fair comparison, as Midjourney is outstanding at a wide range of styles beyond photography. Generating a “word bubble” is going to look terrible in every major diffusion model. Cohesive words and writing in image models is still highly specialised.
- TheOtherHobbes 3y agoIn my first few hours with DiffusionBee I made a couple of very credible semi-abstract portraits by mashing up the styles of unrelated artists. And some splashy watercolours. And some logo line art. And the inevitable booby cheesy rendered forest fairy. I don't think they're terrible at all. They absolutely can make original art with decent production values. They can't write text yet, but I'm sure that's coming soon.