The self-driving car level system is stupid because it is implies linearity but it is absolutely not. It also implies that higher level == better, which is cer

The self-driving car level system is stupid because it is implies linearity but it is absolutely not. It also implies that higher level == better, which is certainly not a given. Is a system that can drive well on 10% of roads 99% of the time better than a system that can drive on 90% of roads 80% of the time? Not objectively. The former is "level 3" and the latter is "level 2". A solution that can get you to 3 quickly might never get you to 4. And just because you beat someone else to market with "level 3" doesn't mean their solution won't skip over yours straight to 4/5.