3 ms·
> The internal prompt was figured out within minutes. So what? > And there are plenty of examples of this tool messing up questions entirely. And even when i
by bhouston 3y ago
> The internal prompt was figured out within minutes.
So what?
> And there are plenty of examples of this tool messing up questions entirely. And even when it doesn't destroy the questions, it still edits far too much minor and irrelevant stuff.
If it can usually help but sometimes doesn't, then this is just an optional suggestion which can be skipped. This seems like a decent design for rolling this out.
- fabian2k 3y agoThe users that are the most likely to benefit from this kind of tool are also the least likely to be able to judge the quality of the edits it produces. Especially if you're not a native English speaker you might not notice that it changed the meaning of the text in some way. It wasn't hard to trigger problems here, it isn't like this mostly works. And it also breaks code in a way that invalidates the question. With no visible trail of the original question being available.
- falcor84 3y ago> if you're not a native English speaker you might not notice that it changed the meaning of the text in some way Many questions (especially, but not only, from non-native English speakers) are very unclear and ambiguous already, so I wouldn't be that concerned if the meaning is slightly changed - at the very least, GenAI text tends to be self-consistent. > it also breaks code What is this referring to? As I understand it, the tool being discussed only makes suggestions about the title.