3 ms·
Id vote to take it a step further and charge agriculture market prices for water regardless of where they sell their crop. Seems like that would largely solve t
by crobertsbmw 3y ago
Id vote to take it a step further and charge agriculture market prices for water regardless of where they sell their crop. Seems like that would largely solve the issue altogether.
- ajmurmann 3y agoI've been long in favor of this and didn't understand why we don't do this, since it's a no-brainer. Then I learned that farmers don't get their water from the faucet. The water comes from their own wells, creeks running over their property etc. They have water rights that in many cases have been in place for 100+ years. Touching those and attacking their livelihood through such big moves would likely lead to more upheaval than any politician is comfortable with.
- waterhouse 3y agoWell, then why not buy that water from the farmers at a market price?
- ajmurmann 3y agoThat's an interesting idea. I wonder how that would work for things like not taking water out of the aquifer. I guess a rate could be negotiated.
- njovin 3y ago55% of the California's allotment of water from the Colorado river goes to farms that grow feed for livestock. That's a considerable amount of non-well water that's being practically given away to allow corporations to profit.