> I'm glad there are still people using and working on XEmacs. Asking seriously: why? I remember that maintaining XEmacs compatibility in some Emacs packages (

> I'm glad there are still people using and working on XEmacs. Asking seriously: why? I remember that maintaining XEmacs compatibility in some Emacs packages (I think it was AUCTeX, not sure) was an additional burden on the maintainers. Given that the userbase of XEmacs is probably very, very small, it would make sense to divert the efforts here towards GNU Emacs, no? The only reason I can think of to think that it's good that XEmacs is still maintained is that one does not think FSF does TRT politically and/or technically. Is that your reason?