3 ms·
I've used both and while from a technical standpoint CCS might be superior (I have no idea), in practice NACS is sleeker and feels less clunky. Is that a good
by belval 3y ago
I've used both and while from a technical standpoint CCS might be superior (I have no idea), in practice NACS is sleeker and feels less clunky.
Is that a good reason to adopt a standard that isn't open? Probably not. Does the average customer cares and will it have an impact on their day to day? Probably not.
EDIT: Seems like NACS is open after all so I don't really understand why we would bother with CCS.
- tensor 3y agoMy understanding is that NACS is open: https://www.tesla.com/blog/opening-north-american-charging-standard https://www.tesla.com/blog/opening-north-american-charging-s...
- simondotau 3y agoIt's open in every respect that matters, but pedants will rightly point out that it hasn't been submitted to a classic standards body (like SAE) to formalise in the way that satisfies middle management and expensive consultants.
- shmoe 3y agoits called NACS because they opened it up.. didn't really have much of a name before.