3 ms·
So the correct conclusion should be "this is a promising research direction worthy of a bigger study", not necessarily "this is a good way to identify hit songs
by wongarsu 3y ago
So the correct conclusion should be "this is a promising research direction worthy of a bigger study", not necessarily "this is a good way to identify hit songs".
- CaptainNegative 3y agoI'm not sure even the first statement is entirely fair. As far as I can tell this result is indistinguishable from "a sufficiently powerful model can distinguish data generated by two different popsynth models". I would have had more faith had they scrambled the labels and run the experiment of distinguishing one random subset of songs from another random subset. Anything greater than 50% would indicate the model's ability to overfit; I'd like to know how accurately their model would perform.