3 ms·

You are absolutely right about the documentation aspect. We are about four years into Teams and no one can find anything. Massive numbers of dead channels. Fil

You are absolutely right about the documentation aspect. We are about four years into Teams and no one can find anything. Massive numbers of dead channels. Files and things all over the place. Notification hell. One particular bad aspect is people started recording meetings. No one has any idea where these things get put. There are links that are shared but where are the actual files. I use a OneNote to keep track of links. It's craziness. Miro has its own management issues as well once you start getting projects and things in the mix. It's like every new app now is designed to work with maybe a handful of objects but beyond that it's a huge mess.

regularfry 3y ago
To be fair, Slack also suffers from the "write-only medium" problem.
TeMPOraL 3y ago
> We are about four years into Teams and no one can find anything. Massive numbers of dead channels. Files and things all over the place. Notification hell. (...) No one has any idea where these things get put. There are links that are shared but where are the actual files. Isn't this what SharePoint is for? As in, Teams integrates with it, so all the recordings, and planning boards, and file uploads, and yes - chats too, end up being stored there - where it is indexed and searchable (subject to your IT dept. competence and company access policies). I have a feeling that most of the complaints about Teams come from people using it standalone, vs. a small part of a whole suite of tools Microsoft sells to businesses. This of course doesn't excuse Teams being shitty in those cases - but perhaps explains why I, and some others, tend to have almost no negative experience with Teams.