3 ms·
In philosophy, the most common definition of knowledge is that it is true, justified belief[1]. In that definition knowledge certainly is predicated to be corre
by nirse 3y ago
In philosophy, the most common definition of knowledge is that it is true, justified belief[1]. In that definition knowledge certainly is predicated to be correct.
[1] https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-analysis https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-analysis
- ehnto 3y agoSo is an argument that an LLM has no knowledge because it can't reason about justification of it's replies? I could see that. A lot of justification is just "because I read it in a book I trust" or "heard it from an authority" which isn't all that dissimilar to an LLM's outcome. An LLMs response is also justified by it's training, not unlike a person in a position of authority. It doesn't challenge the idea that both a religious believer and non-believer have a certain knowledge of the world. These kinds of conflicts of knowledge are common, not just in religion, there is no single understanding of the world to reference against.